Sunday, 2 June 2019

The Piper


(Kim Gwang-tae/2015/South Korea)


Taking the pied piper myth and reframing it within post war Korea, The Piper is at times fantastical but ultimately nightmarish and violent. Veering between straight narrative and flashback it also veers thematically between social comment, myth and classic revenge story. I’d resist calling it compelling viewing but it kept me entertained throughout.

(3/5)    

Saturday, 1 June 2019

Bagdad Cafe


(Percy Adlon/1987/Germany & USA) 

A German lady breaks up with her oafish husband in the midst of dustbowl America and lands in with a variety of characters living in and around the Bagdad Cafe, a roadside pit stop for truckers and travellers. And therein we witness the slow build of camaraderie and a shared spirit, particularly between the two wonderful leads, Marianne Sägebrecht and C.C.H. Pounder. Bagdad Cafe is of its time, when films could be quirky for quirk’s sake and I actually felt a stab of nostalgia watching it. A film like it, produced today, would probably get shredded. It survives the test of time though, as no matter how put on the eccentricities of character, at its core is straight as a die friendship and shared human experience. It is heart-warming, funny and unapologetic and Jack Palance turns in a magnificent performance also.

(3/5)   

Sunday, 26 May 2019

Permanent Objections


(Grzegorz Królikiewicz/1975/Poland)

Although the subtitles translate the title as Eternal Grievances this film is widely referred to as Permanent Objections but I have also seen it called Perpetual Claims or Constant Complaints. An ambiguous title then for what is a surreal, arthouse experiment using the lives of a pair of ordinary men in communist Poland as a metaphor for the impossibility of state led moral responsibility. How can Franek and Rysio be trusted to properly inspect meat factories and enforce compliance when they are beholden to their own base instincts, the one a lustful, misogynistic flirt, the other a deceitful gambler and both drink sodden carousers? They are human, subject to temptation and the film is a jab at the state that would try and force some sort of moral regime on people by people. 

For me it is saying we are responsible for ourselves and nanny state intervention encourages iniquity or maybe the metaphor is for the inherent corruption of the state as it attempts to enforce a moral code – impossible, as the enforcers are all too human and open to debasement. Either way it is a mesmerizing 90 minutes of skewed, jarring cinema utilizing a myriad of techniques to break conventions and question the viewer. Admittedly some of these come off as film student grade cinema but in the main it’s an engaging and though provoking flick.

(3/5)